Saturday, May 21, 2011

I just read a little booklet put together as a tribute to one of my mentors, Dr. Max van Manen of the University of Alberta upon his retirement.  A wonderful tribute to a person thoroughly deserving of tributes. In my small and humble submission to this project I wrote,

Max, sadly for me, was often a voice crying in the wilderness.  Amid the contemporary storm of calls for 'accountability' which, for most educators translates into increased performance scores, Max continued to cry out for the fundamental accounting of a teacher to his students.  His vision of the trusted, caring protector who walks with his students into the larger world, is as real in this fragmented and wired world as it was in the world of the ancient Greeks.”

 I'm pessimistic about the future of education when I see that people like Dr. van Manen and the wonderful contrarian, Dr. Alfie Kohn, are sometimes relegated to village idiot status by the present 'thinkers, movers and shakers' in education.  These new education nabobs seem to be fascinated (blinded) by two themes - themes that are not bad in themselves, but that become so when seen as THE answer to all of our problems.  The latest gadget (not i Pad, but i Pad 2!, or whatever the megamothercorp pukes out next) rather than a useful tool, becomes the must have, the new engine for discovery learning, the road to pedagogical nirvana, the thing-without-which-we-cannot- live.  And those who happen to have a head start on others because of the idle hours they spent gaming in their recent youth, suddenly become the new swamis, and how stupid you are not to thoughtlessly follow them.  

The second theme is the unreflective reliance on the procedures and findings of 'science' as the one true road to educational wisdom.  The most suspect phrase in all of education is 'studies show...'  Dueling studies, rarely read but often adopted by lazy bandwagon jumpers, raise more questions than answers, and pose as authoritative pills to suppress healthy skepticism.  Studies show that studies show almost anything the reader wants them to.  Or, most often, they simply confirm the obvious. 

And the sacrificial lambs, the children, sit and wait for us to take their hands, offer a smile, offer a little bit of ourselves, and walk with them into an often cruel and confusing world.  But we'd rather be erudite than thoughtful, up-to-date rather than authentic, mechanical and systematic rather than human.

5 comments:

  1. Nice post! As I write this from my evil iPad 2, i would like to think that educatos could be both "up-to-date" AND authentic, thoughtful and human...no?

    Anyway, I'm so proud of you for beginning this journey with blogging, with sharing YOUR authentic, thoughtful and human 'two cents worth'! As always, thought-provoking reading...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Education is a very large house, but can we agree that the foundation of that house is formed from the individual student-teacher relationships? If so, what are the characteristics of effective teachers? This we need to know (study) in order to have a system that does the best it can for its students.

    I don't share the skepticism for the future of educational thought and practice. It is our hope for the future and one that will always begin with the student-teacher relationship.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Richard. I am in total agreement with you that our focus should be on issues like the 'characteristics of effective teachers'. However, even this seemingly obvious area is frought with difficulties. What is 'an effective teacher'? How is this measured? I'm afraid that the current educational leaders would default to something like, "Effective teachers deliver improved test scores", the assumption being that tests are the best, if not the only indicator of student learning.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Really? I think if people (even the current educational leaders) are pressed to describe the most effective teacher they ever had, test scores will not be mentioned...however, in reality, their decisions about policies and funding rarely reflect a desire to nurture student-teacher relationships (I agree-the most crucial factor!) - they want the biggest bang for their bucks - test scores that can be published and lobby groups who can be satisfied (or silenced)...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks for noticing Patty. We're on the same page, happily, but I need to tell you that it's very hard to find writers (blogs, articles, tweets) addressing the foundational importance of the teacher/student dynamic. Rather, we find a flurry of articles about how to incorporate the new technologies, as if, finally, the magic key that will unlock student indifference to schooling has been found. I'm not opposed to new technologies and I would use anything I could afford, but how I use it would be dictated by something other than the technology itself. Any technology, even a story told to a child, should serve as just one more window onto the world. It shouldn't become the world itself.

    ReplyDelete